Senior Cross-Cutting Researcher

About the role

GiveWell is seeking a Senior Researcher on our Cross-Cutting team to help us make better funding decisions across our entire portfolio. The Cross-Cutting team works on methodological questions, research quality, and big-picture problems that don't sit naturally inside any single program area. Cross-Cutting team's work has included pressure-testing our work through retrospective evaluations of completed grants ( "lookbacks" ) and scrutinizing grantmaking areas ( "red teaming" ), collecting more on-the-ground quantitative and qualitative information to check what our grantmaking might be missing, looking for ways to use AI to improve our research process, experimenting with new ways to solicit feedback , figuring out how to quantify the "value of information" in our grantmaking, and answering thorny research questions that affect our entire portfolio. As a Senior Cross-Cutting Researcher, you'll shape ambitious research agendas that cut across GiveWell's portfolios and answer complex questions that inform grantmaking decisions across the organization. The researchers on our team combine rigorous evidence review, cost-effectiveness modeling, and thoughtful judgment. We're open to a wide variety of professional development pathways depending on your preferences and our needs. You will be joining a small team focused on the methodological and cross-portfolio questions that shape how GiveWell does research. You'll sift through the countless questions we could try to answer, hone in on those that matter most, and partner with grantmaking teams (Malaria, Water, Nutrition, Vaccines, Livelihoods, New Areas) to pressure-test and extend their work. You'll also communicate externally about your work and mentor and advise other researchers on the team. You will shape a research agenda that brings rigor and creativity to the thorniest questions GiveWell faces across its grantmaking. Your work will combine empirical evidence review and critical synthesis, cost-effectiveness modeling, discussions with subject matter experts, understanding of the broader context, and your own judgment. In the course of your work, you might approach questions like: Are our grants actually achieving what we predicted? How do we know, and how can we improve our decisions over time? How do we systematically incorporate field insights, monitoring data, and external feedback into our work? How do we design M&E systems that tell us whether grants are working, not just whether grantees are reporting what we asked for? How can we use AI tools to speed up or increase the quality of our work? How should we model spillover effects? Do health programs affect income, and vice versa? Are we consistent in how we handle this across program areas? How should we set our cost-effectiveness bar over time when funding and spending vary unpredictably year to year? How should we value averting a death versus improving health outcomes versus increasing income? (Our "moral weights" problem) Where are the systematic risks in our research (i.e., the areas where if we're wrong, we're making big mistakes in how we allocate funding)? Team structure Our research department has over 60 people, and is currently organized into eight teams, including Cross-Cutting: Five of the teams (Water, Livelihoods, Nutrition, Malaria, and Vaccines) focus on specific areas of grantmaking. The New Areas team focuses on interventions in domains that are new to GiveWell. The Commons team provides generalized research support to each of the other teams, including landscaping research, vetting, and publishing. The Cross-Cutting team works closely with other grantmaking teams. Projects typically involve partnering with a team to pressure-test or extend their work, or running methodological projects that set standards across the department. Team values We think our research team has unique qualities: We care deeply and centrally about finding and sharing truth. Truth-seeking is one of our core values . We post our mistakes and we prize our team members who keep our culture of free-flowing feedback strong. We are independent. We focus 100% on finding the most cost-effective opportunities to save and improve lives. Our researchers assist in communicating our research findings to the public and our donors, and on occasion we provide tailored advice to ultra-high-net-worth donors who want to rely on our expertise to direct their giving-but we never ask our researchers to trade off against honesty, or to hide their real beliefs. We don't waste time. Once it's clear that a particular research question is unlikely to change our botto

Benefits

Additional Information

GiveWell is a research organization that identifies and funds cost-effective giving opportunities, focusing on global health and well-being. Our work is funded by tens of thousands of donors who rely on our research to inform their giving. We've grown from directing $1.5 million in 2010 to directing more than $400 million in 2025.

Your Match

How well this role fits your profile.

Company Intel

What employees say

Worked at givewell? Share your experience