How to Address Innovation in Higher Ed Accreditation
External
Full-timeOn-site83mo ago
Move
Prepare for this interview
EliteAI-generated questions, company research, and talking points tailored to this role
About the role
A consistent critique regarding accreditation is that it is resistant to innovation. This is true -- to an extent, say Phillips and Kinser. As the guardian of quality, the accreditation process is designed to be risk-averse. However, the process also inherently promotes innovation by always looking for improvements in quality. Accreditors must strike a balance when it comes to innovation. Move too quick, and students can be harmed and public dollars wasted. Move too slow, and the system can't keep up.
Your Match
How well this role fits your profile.
Company Intel
What employees say
Worked at rss@higheredjobs.com (Susan D. Phillips and Kevin Kinser, Ph.D.)? Share your experience